You make an interesting point.

I agree with Hexi; simply adding the word “portal” to the rule would clarify the rule. {”7. You may not prevent other players from entering dream portals or accessing areas on main maps, regardless of the means used to do so.”}

Tho, I’m sure players (and the rule enforcers) are not too terribly mixed up over possible misinterpretations of the rule. The way the rule is now, even if someone interprets it as meaning that dream owners shouldn’t use the banish command {and I doubt few would truly believe that as correct}, the possible results would be:

– Someone decides not to use the banish command in their own dream because they think it’s wrong because of rule #7 {an unlikely occurrence, since most people would use the simple logic of “well, it’s a useful command, and if the game creators didn’t want me using it they wouldn’t have made it.”}

– Some troublemaker who was ejected/banned/prevented-from-entering in a dream will complain to Guardians. {At which point the Guardians would explain that dream owners are allowed to decide who can be in their dream.}

– Some clever players notice the semantics of the rule and write an article about it ;)

All things considered, the above possible results of leaving the rule the way it is would not be catastophic, other than causing extra work for Guardians {who we all know are paid mucho big buckaroonies for every complaint call they handle, so they probvably like having the extra work ;}… but yes, it would be nice if the rule was clarified, just for the sake of Peace And Order in the Universe.

:)

On a relevant note though: it’s good to see (or shoudl that be ‘hear’?) you’ve gone and done a recording of your opinion rather than relying solely on text. While I enjoy reading what people have to say, I enjoy hearing what they have to say even more so.

Cheers.

Spoon is not a choice but a way of life.